Narrative + Numbers
More evidence. A clearer conversation.
No single source decides the outcome. Reviewers examine where evidence agrees, conflicts, or remains incomplete.
Founder narrative
Strategy, assumptions, decisions, dependencies, concerns, and possible failure pathways.
Financial and operating evidence
Funding, runway, revenue, spending, acquisition activity, investor concentration, customer indicators, and performance direction.
Supporting documents
Company records that support, challenge, or leave uncertainty around the narrative and numbers.
Historical pathways
Relevant patterns drawn from startup histories, including historically comparable businesses in the same or adjacent market, industry, or business-model context.
Three separate judgements
Current concern, evidence confidence, and historical-pattern relevance are shown separately. A concern about current conditions is different from confidence in the available evidence. Historical resemblance provides context.
Missing evidence remains unknown. Reviewers consider conflicting information and evidence gaps before deciding what feedback is appropriate.
Context for decisions—not a prediction.
Historical similarity does not mean two startups will follow the same outcome. Pre-Mortem Insights does not calculate a probability of failure, provide a guarantee, or replace professional advice. It identifies relevant pathways, evidence gaps, protective factors, and practical actions for human consideration.
From your assessment to reviewed feedback
Choose an English or Korean questionnaire, complete it thoughtfully, and return it with supporting evidence. The reviewer examines the submitted version, prepares private findings, and checks the customer preview before explicitly publishing a report.