TEST PREVIEW Use fictional test information onlyExample dashboard
Pre-Mortem InsightsSign in
Menu

EXPLORE THE PMI DASHBOARD

A clearer view of the whole company.

See how reviewed findings, operating evidence, and practical priorities come together.

Fictional demonstration. All company details and findings below are illustrative. No customer information is shown.

Pre-Mortem Insights review

Northstar Works Ltd — Fictional Demo

Pre-Mortem Insights Review — Fictional Demonstration

Assessment date
8 Jul 2026
Report version
2.1
Report date
18 Jul 2026
Next review
18 Oct 2026

Three separate reviewed dimensions

Current concern

Elevated

Several current operating issues merit active management, particularly runway, acquisition efficiency, and delivery capacity.

Evidence confidence

Moderate

The fictional evidence pack is sufficient across key areas, with defined gaps in cohort retention and integration benefits.

Historical-pattern relevance

Some Relevance

Some contextual patterns are relevant to the review, but they do not estimate failure probability or determine concern.

These dimensions remain separate. They support decisions and do not estimate failure probability; they are not a prediction or a composite score.

Venture review profile

StrengthRequires attention

Business model & strategic direction

Pricing and packaging remain only partly validated.

Product & delivery readiness

Two important integrations remain dependent on a small team.

Market, funding & external conditions

Fundraising lead time could extend beyond the base-case runway.

Customers & commercial momentum

Acquisition cost is rising and retention evidence is incomplete.

Leadership, team & operating capability

Engineering capacity and management bandwidth are constrained.

Priority findings

PriorityReview areaFindingConcernConfidenceRecommended response
HighMarket, funding and external conditionsBase-case runway is below the fundraising lead-time assumptionElevatedHighExtend runway and prepare a staged funding contingency plan.
HighCustomers and commercial momentumAcquisition cost is rising faster than revenue efficiencyElevatedModerateReassess channel mix, pricing, and cohort contribution before scaling spend.
MediumProduct and delivery readinessTwo key integrations depend on constrained delivery capacityModerateModeratePrioritise the critical integration path and define a de-scope option.
MediumLeadership, team and operating capabilityEngineering and leadership bandwidth are concentratedModerateModerateRebalance ownership and secure interim delivery capacity.
LowBusiness model and strategic directionEnterprise demand is present but packaging needs validationLowModerateRun a time-boxed packaging test with qualified prospects.

Current financial position

Current cash
£2.4M
Monthly revenue
£420,000
Net burn
£310,000
Runway
7.7 months
Gross margin
62%
Next funding requirement
£8M
Cash balance over time
31 Jan 202631 Jul 2026
31 Jan 2026
4,180,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
28 Feb 2026
3,840,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Mar 2026
3,460,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Apr 2026
3,080,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 May 2026
2,730,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Jun 2026
2,400,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Jul 2026
2,060,000; Forecast; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
Monthly net burn
31 Jan 202631 Jul 2026
31 Jan 2026
335,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
28 Feb 2026
350,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Mar 2026
382,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Apr 2026
365,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 May 2026
325,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Jun 2026
310,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Jul 2026
340,000; Forecast; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
Runway trend
31 Jan 202631 Jul 2026
31 Jan 2026
12.5; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
28 Feb 2026
11; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Mar 2026
9.1; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Apr 2026
8.4; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 May 2026
8.4; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Jun 2026
7.7; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Jul 2026
6.1; Forecast; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
Operating growth alignment
31 Jan 202631 Jul 2026
  • Active customers
  • Operating expenses

Each series is indexed to 100 at its first reported period. This is a factual comparison, not a risk score.

Funding journey

  1. Founded

    Completed

    15 Jan 2022

    £150,000

    As of: 15 Jul 2026

    Evidence status: Verified

    source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

  2. Seed round

    Completed

    20 Mar 2023

    £1.2M

    As of: 15 Jul 2026

    Evidence status: Verified

    source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

  3. Series A

    Completed

    10 Oct 2024

    £5.5M

    As of: 15 Jul 2026

    Evidence status: Verified

    source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

  4. Bridge funding

    Bridge Extension

    28 Feb 2026

    £1.5M

    As of: 15 Jul 2026

    Evidence status: Verified

    source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

  5. Next funding need

    Planned

    31 Oct 2026

    £8M

    As of: 15 Jul 2026

    Evidence status: Not Verified

    source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

Customer & commercial indicators

MRR over time
31 Jan 202631 Jul 2026
31 Jan 2026
302,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
28 Feb 2026
323,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Mar 2026
345,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Apr 2026
371,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 May 2026
397,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Jun 2026
420,000; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Jul 2026
438,000; Forecast; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
Active customers over time
31 Jan 202631 Jul 2026
31 Jan 2026
138; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
28 Feb 2026
146; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Mar 2026
155; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Apr 2026
166; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 May 2026
177; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
30 Jun 2026
186; Actual; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
31 Jul 2026
194; Forecast; source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack
Active customers
186
Customer acquisition cost
£1,320
Revenue growth
18%
Churn
2.3%
Retention
112%
Sales Cycle Days
64 Days

Investor structure & governance

Ownership breakdown
  • Founders38%
  • Venture investors42%
  • Option pool12%
  • Other holders8%
Board Seats
5
Observer Rights
1
Protective Provisions
4
Board composition

Five seats: three investor and two founder representatives.

As of: 15 Jul 2026

Evidence status: Verified

source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

Observer rights

One fictional observer right recorded.

As of: 15 Jul 2026

Evidence status: Verified

source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

Protective provisions

Standard reserved matters; legal confirmation pending.

As of: 15 Jul 2026

Evidence status: Partially Verified

source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

Reporting cadence

Monthly packs exist but commercial cohorts remain incomplete.

As of: 15 Jul 2026

Evidence status: Partially Verified

source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

Acquisition & integration

TargetStatusPurposeIntegration result

Atlas Integrations — Fictional

As of: 15 Jul 2026

Evidence status: Partially Verified

source: Fictional demonstration evidence pack

In ProgressAccelerate two enterprise integrations.Technical progress is visible, while capacity pressure is delaying the second release.

Evidence alignment

Review areaAssessmentOperating dataSupporting evidenceRelationshipConfidenceInterpretation
Market demandModerate concernModerate concernFictional demonstration evidence packEvidence Is MixedModerateDemand exists, but conversion efficiency is weakening.
Runway sufficiencyElevated concernElevated concernFictional demonstration evidence packEvidence AlignsHighCash, burn, and fundraising timing support the concern.
Product readinessElevated concernModerate concernFictional demonstration evidence packEvidence Adds ContextModerateDelivery evidence narrows the issue to integration capacity.
Team capabilityModerate concernLow concernFictional demonstration evidence packEvidence Is MixedModerateHeadcount is growing, but critical ownership remains concentrated.
Governance cadenceLow concernModerate concernFictional demonstration evidence packEvidence Adds ContextModerateBoard structure is clear; reporting completeness needs attention.

Recommended action plan

PriorityActionOwnerTarget dateStatusSuccess measure
HighAgree a runway extension plan with defined trigger dates.Chief financial officer30 Aug 2026In ProgressBase-case runway is at least 12 months.
HighReallocate spend using channel-level CAC and retention evidence.Head of growth15 Aug 2026PlannedApproved channel plan with a measurable CAC reduction target.
MediumProtect the critical integration team and agree a de-scope decision.Chief technology officer1 Sept 2026In ProgressPriority integration meets its revised acceptance criteria.
MediumSecure interim engineering capacity and redistribute leadership ownership.Chief executive officer22 Aug 2026PlannedNamed owners and capacity are assigned to critical workstreams.
LowAdd customer cohorts and integration milestones to the monthly pack.Chief operating officer10 Aug 2026CompleteThe revised pack is reviewed at the next board meeting.

Human-reviewed decision support

This fictional demonstration illustrates decision support. It is not a prediction, guarantee, valuation, investment recommendation, or composite risk score.

The historical reference set consists of organisations that experienced validated failure pathways. Similarity does not estimate the probability of failure and does not establish that the same characteristics are absent from surviving ventures.

Human review requiredDated source valuesNo composite risk score